Food Allergies May Not Be as Bad as You Thought

By Victoria Robertson on December 7, 2016

Food allergies are extremely common, and for those of us living with them, for the more serious ones, we’ve had to adjust our lives to do so. For some, a simple peanut butter sandwich can be a death sentence, which can be a big deal in campus dorms and cafeterias.

According to science, however, this could all be a giant hoax.

At least, in some cases.

And this problem is specific to America. Go us!

According to a panel of top experts in the field, food allergies aren’t backed up by evidence, so the increased number of individuals claiming to be allergic to food may not be true representatives of the problem. This all according to a statement made by the panel on Wednesday.

According to them, the requirements that constitute a food allergy have been mixed up by parents, doctors and their patients. Why is this the case? Because there really isn’t any true testing to determine whether or not someone is allergic to something.

This information was written in a new report put out by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.

And according to the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, close to 5 percent of children in the United States have food allergies.

So while this number doesn’t seem very high, it is something to pay attention to, as the number also appears to be growing.

So what are the most common allergens?

According to the panel, “eight food groups are considered to be major allergens. These are milk, egg, peanut, tree nuts, wheat, soy, fish, and crustacean shellfish.”

pexels.com

So while these are common allergens, this still doesn’t explain why there’s been an increase in people that become allergic to such foods.

According to Dr. Virginia Stallings and her committee at the Nutrition Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, “questions persist about whether food allergy prevalence has been on the rise within the past two decades and why. The current data do not unequivocally support the occurrence of such a rise.”

In other words, the panel has no idea what’s going on, but they’re fairly certain that the rise in those with allergies is not due to science, but rather to a misunderstanding of what constitutes a food allergy.

Which would make sense, especially considering the confusion surrounding “newer” allergies such as gluten allergies.

Another important distinction to make is that there is actually a difference between an allergy and an intolerance. When foods upset your stomach, this doesn’t necessarily mean that you are allergic to them, but rather, that they upset your stomach or don’t “sit well.”

Again, this isn’t necessarily an allergy.

According to the panel, this is a common mistake, as symptoms can be mistaken for one another. The reaction to an intolerance wouldn’t be life threatening, but the reaction to an actual allergy would be.

The panel advises the government on health and scientific matters, and they suggest that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should be doing more to determine the commonness of food allergies to help interpret the rising numbers.

In this request, they claimed, “no simple, accurate diagnostic test exists for food allergy.”

So while there are definitive ways to test for other allergies — such as dust and pollen — food allergies aren’t really able to be tested.

The panel said the following.

“The patient’s medical history and other test results, such as from a skin prick test, can suggest the likelihood of a food allergy, but in some cases an oral food challenge — which involves a gradual, medically supervised ingestion of increasingly larger doses of the food being tested as a possible allergen — is needed to confirm diagnosis.”

In other words, it’s an entire ordeal to get your food allergies accurately tested, so people typically just guess as to whether or not they are allergic to a certain food.

Regardless of whether or not we are allergic to food, Americans worry about such things and take them seriously, which is another big reason that we need to begin developing an accurate test for them.

According to the panel:

“This committee had the unique opportunity to hear directly from an advisory panel made up of nine parents of children with food allergies and one individual with food allergy. We heard about the anxiety they feel in restaurants, schools, airplanes, and other settings where they are fearful about unintentional exposure to a food that can cause a life-threatening allergic reaction.”

So how can we prevent allergies?

That would appear to be the next logical step, right?

Well, studies are now suggesting that this is a possibility. If children are given foods commonly associated with allergies earlier in life, this could possibly prevent allergies later on.

However, there hasn’t been enough research done to test this theory, as it’s possible that younger children already have these allergies, in which case such exposure would be extremely dangerous. Plus, there’s no guarantee prior exposure will even prevent allergies, as there isn’t enough evidence to support this theory.

So while we need to be aware of allergies, we also need to keep an eye out for more information, as there’s probably plenty we don’t even know.

Follow Uloop

Apply to Write for Uloop News

Join the Uloop News Team

Discuss This Article

Back to Top

Log In

Contact Us

Upload An Image

Please select an image to upload
Note: must be in .png, .gif or .jpg format
OR
Provide URL where image can be downloaded
Note: must be in .png, .gif or .jpg format

By clicking this button,
you agree to the terms of use

By clicking "Create Alert" I agree to the Uloop Terms of Use.

Image not available.

Add a Photo

Please select a photo to upload
Note: must be in .png, .gif or .jpg format